Archive for April, 2009

Who Will Stop the Bleeding?

The national debt is skyrocketing. Our new administration seems to think that it can outspend its way out of an economic recession. When will this stop? For my generation, what will it look like 20 or 30 years in the future? Our government and country seems to be headed in such a poor fiscal direction that we should all pack up and leave for more prosperous shores.

I’m the last person to stick my neck out there and examine the financial climate. But can’t simple common sense go a long way in dictating how to approach spending? My parents raised me to only buy what you can afford — falling into the category of what you need. Instead of following a false American dream of buy now, pay later, I saw that you can be rewarded by living within your means.

Already, around the three month mark of a new administration, the feeling of hope is gone, sucked from a public eager for something new. I voted for Obama, and still stand by that — sensing that he was the change that could make a difference. I’m not giving up on that, but what discourages me is how the spending does not stop. Stimulus this. Deficit that. No one seems to have any foresight as to the problems a huge deficit will create. Being no economist, I have no way of knowing what will happen. But at some point, when the creditors come calling, will their be any loot in the coffer to pay the man? And what if there isn’t?

Pay to Read – Online?

A first glance at this article and it may easy to jump to a conclusion. Rupert Murdoch just wants to line his pockets with even more green — as if he needs anymore money. But simply looking around to observe the newspaper landscape, the major newspapers are failing around the country. The wheels of journalism cannot be greased using online ad revenue alone:

Murdoch pointed to the Journal’s main rival in the United States, The New York Times, as an example. The Times has one of the most popular U.S. newspaper websites, but still cannot cover its costs with online ads, he said.

While the idea of being charged to read a paper on the Internet, it makes sense. Consider the alternative, the reality of the situation:

Time is running out. Some U.S. publishers like Tribune Co have filed for bankruptcy. Others, including Hearst Corp and EW Scripps Co, have been shutting down big city dailies. Still others are furloughing employees, cutting pay and buying out or laying off thousands of workers.

It is almost cringe inducing to think about actually paying to read one’s newspaper. But wait a second — isn’t that what we’ve done all along? By allowing free online content, newspapers are stubbornly clinging to their sinking ship. A personal suggestion of mine? Ask for donations. Papers with a larger readership could bring in extra cash flow by setting up online donations. Yes, it goes against the theory of capitalism, but who knows what will happen. After all, it isn’t cheap to provide indepth journalism coverage.